A Generation of Mentors

It’s hard for me to re-read KPMG‘s October report “BC Junior Mining at a Crossroads,” commissioned by the BC Securities Commission, without feeling not just loss but what will be lost. The report’s findings echo the lamentations of my friends and former colleagues who run or rely on public companies in the natural resources sector: This is the worst downturn ever; there is almost no money to be had; the senior mining firms have abandoned the junior companies, as have younger investors.

van

The report’s language is succinct:

– Less money is currently being put into exploration or the necessary studies needed to move a project forward (for financing or development). Much of the funding raised is survival capital, i.e., being used to keep the company operational until such times as the market returns.

– As stock prices have dropped significantly and the market appetite for Juniors has lessened, it has become increasingly difficult and less attractive to raise funds through public offerings. The dilution factor is a major concern of most of the Juniors, as they do not see the upside of
significant dilution of ownership.

– There was some sentiment amongst the Juniors that until the Seniors show consecutive quarters of profits without further write-downs of “toxic” assets on their balance sheets, junior mining company projects will not be of interest to the Seniors. Until stock prices rise and investment returns to the Seniors, Juniors will continue to have a problem raising money.

– The competition for investment capital has become more intense, and Juniors stand to be less competitive than many sectors because of their risky nature and the longer term required for return on investment, if any.

– As a result, many Juniors have chosen to go into a survival mode instead, until the markets become more favourable and interested in mineral exploration investments. However survival is still not cheap. Maintaining a listing and other administrative requirements can cost from $75,000 to $150,000 per year, depending on the circumstances of the company. Many Juniors only have $100,000 in cash available and will only be able to survive another year or so.

When these Juniors disappear, their management, geologists, geophysicists, and technicians will need to find new lines of work. So will their corporate communications and investor relations officers.

Indeed, these latter are often the first to go when funding’s gone. At least these people, though, have skills and experience that transfer relatively easily across sectors of service and commerce – from retail to not-for profits, from education to government – and across lines on a map.

Whither the geophysicists and their high-end colleagues?

I don’t fear for their economic survival; they are super-smart and resilient folk; they will make it, somehow, but elsewhere, away from Canada’s once exalted mining industry. My fear is that they won’t come back when the Junior market does, however many years that this will take.

And then who will mentor BCIT’s newly minted geotechnicians and UBC’s young geologists, guiding them in the field, fostering their laboratory acumen, keeping them safe, and supporting them with continual education and feedback? How will this new generation fare when their mentors are elsewhere?

(photo of Granville Street, Vancouver, by Bob Basil)

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Vancouver’s Commonweal

4945209887_ac8c3af18d_z

In North America it is Canada’s decided, tenacious commonweal that sets it apart. We look after one another more often than not, and less out of zeal than out of habit and good sense.

A city’s public library is a testament to its commonweal.

I was delighted but not surprised, then, when I read that Vancouver’s public library had been named the world’s best city library (tied with the Bibliothèques Montréal), ranking very high in digital / social media resources as well as in physical spaces, collections, and services.

The library has a good twitter feed.

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

You talk just fine?

When teaching oral communications to my students, I don’t feel comfortable critiquing those who speak in “uptalk,” that habit of ending sentences with a rising inflection so that declarative sentences sometimes seem to sound like questions. To me that would be like asking people to change their maritime or southern accents: snobby and obnoxious.

At any rate, the folk at Language Log are on the case. It turns out that research has shown “uptalkers” up their talk earlier and higher in sentences when they are asking questions than when they are making statements.

That is, a good listener should be able to de-code uptalkers’ tones successfully.

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

“More bad writing” …

… presented courtesy of our friend Jonathan Mayhew’s superb blog, Stupid Motivational Tricks: Scholarly Writing and How to Get It Done.” It is a lovely post that ends with this poignant sentence: “There are more objectionable sentences here that I am not quoting.”

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

Changing Norms

Picture 2

Reuben Fischer-Baum of Jezebel has made a wonderfully entertaining GIF that presents six decades of the most popular names for girls, “state by state.” He writes:

Baby naming generally follows a consistent cycle: A name springs up in some region of the U.S.—”Ashley” in the South, “Emily” in the Northeast—sweeps over the country, and falls out of favor nearly as quickly. The big exception to these baby booms and busts is “Jennifer”, which absolutely dominates America for a decade-and-a-half. If you’re named Jennifer and you were born between 1970 and 1984, don’t worry! I’m sure you have a totally cool, unique middle name.

Notably, the recession seems to have put a temporary damper on creative baby naming. In 2007, eight different baby names made the map—including less-traditional names like Addison, Ava, and Madison—and all carried at least two states. By 2012 the map has just five names, and 47 states went with either “Sophia” or “Emma.” A yearning for simpler times?

The fine folk at Language Log dig into the data with their typical, amusing obsessiveness.

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

The copyright robots

There is a wonderful story on NPR this morning, “Record Company Picks Fight – With the Wrong Guy,” about Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig, who was threatened by an Australian record label called Liberation Music with a copyright-infringement lawsuit after he posted a “remix” of one of that label’s songs on YouTube. Lessig happens to teach copyright law, alas, and has fought back against the perhaps inappropriately named music company using an ingenious argument.

Lessig knew he had a legal right to publish these remixes online as part of the “fair use” laws that govern copyright permissions in much of the world. “If I’m using [the remix] for purposes of critique, then I can use if even if I don’t have permission of the original copyright owner,” he says.

From the NPR story: “Lessig decided to invoke another part of the copyright law, ‘which basically polices bad-faith lawsuits’ — threats made fraudulently or without proper basis. Lessig is suing Liberation Music because he wants labels to stop relying on automated systems to send out takedown notices.

“What we’ve got is this computerized system threatening people about content that’s on the Web, much of it legally on the Web,” Lessig says. The problem, he says, is the impact: “what we think of as a very significant chilling of completely legitimate and protected speech.” Lessig hopes his suit will set a precedent that will persuade copyright holders to put human beings who know the law back into the equation.

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

Mediation and Mindfulness

We chose to name this initiative No Contest Communications to highlight our vision of the collaborative workplace, where feedback is gratefully welcomed and usefully shared. Communication and imagination shouldn’t be contests. Conflict is inevitable, though, of course. When people within an organization cannot resolve a conflict on their own, a good mediator can work magic.

The website Mediate.com is a wonderful resource of news, opinion, video, and professional-development opportunities for mediators and arbitrators. But anybody who wants to understand conflict resolution better will find lots of valuable material here, too. In this new video, Mediation and Mindfully Getting in the Middle, Brad Heckman, the Chief Executive Officer of the New York Peace Institute, points out that “We don’t know what we think we know about parties in conflict.” We must “dare to be dumb” and ask open-ended questions without making assumptions, and then the people before us can really appear. Brad Heckman

This is a form of active humility that I try to teach my students and to practice myself. Often it’s hard. I like how Mediate.com blogger Tammy Lenski puts it: “It is a life of supreme joy and of profound despair, of laughter and of tears, of self-satisfaction and self-flagellation. It throws you curves when you’re too sure of yourself and hope when you begin to doubt.”

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Dogma versus Rules of Thumb

Language Log is an always stimulating group blog on language and linguistics, with posts that range from earworms and usage advice to research tools and sociolinguistics. The comments sections are as illuminating as the posts themselves.

A recent post called “Proportion of Adverbs and Adjectives: Some Facts” dismantles the still-too-common notion that good writing needs to avoid adjectives and adverbs. The post is detailed but fun to read, and is tagged under the computational linguistics category, though it could be tagged under prescriptivist poppycock as well.

smallruthless

Commentator Garrett Wollman notes: “[Language Log] itself could be taken as one extended meta-analysis into the question ‘Is there any single piece of writing advice that stands up to objective scrutiny?'”

It’s a great question. My guess is that the answer is Yes … but not many.

 

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Revision : Heterovision

I tell students and clients they shouldn’t take feedback on their work as personal critiques. “You are not the words on the paper on which your reports are printed.” This seems like a straight-forward point, but even seasoned editors tend to forget it on occasion, so I tend to make it a lot. “What we have in common is our concern for the usefulness of this prose here, this separate and individual bit of existence that is neither you nor me.” skatepark

The battery of revision tasks mentioned in the post below illustrates this latter point beautifully.

—–

The word “revision” comes from Latin word revisionem, meaning “to see again.” While an author and an editor might look at a single work of prose more than once, often the work itself needs to be seen, amended, and fixed by other stakeholders and document contributors as well (lawyers, accountants, scientists, project managers, executive assistants), folk who will look at this work of prose just once. What these latter individuals are doing is not, strictly speaking, “seeing again.”

So, perhaps we need a new word to explain what our written works really and more precisely need, over and above “revision.” I suggest heterovision – meaning “seen by others” (hetero coming from the Greek for “other” or “different”). This neologism conveys the collaborative aspect of editing better than the word “revision” does. (Analogous expressions would be heterodoxy and heteronym.)

In sum: While the work itself is looked at again (“revised”), the people who do the fixing, who proffer their critiques, are usually heterovising.

(Could our nifty neologism catch on? I am not betting on it. The prefix “hetero” seems rather charged in our language at the moment, connoting culturally normative and uniform values, I think, rather than what’s inclusive, alternative and welcoming. And editing’s nothing if not “welcoming.”)


Follow me on Twitter: @thebasil

Follow us on Twitter: @nocontestca

Photo of Leeside Skatepark, in Vancouver, by Bob Basil

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“The Canadian Style”

TheCanadianStyleSemicolons

Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) is the nation’s official publisher and our largest translation organization. It also publishes a wonderful online style guide and a collection of writing and editing tools that will handily assist students and teachers, authors and editors, and managers and professionals of any stripe. I dare say that creating this guide must have been a labour of love for a number of people. Every section into which I have dipped is utterly clear and helpful, and often illuminating as well.

From the website: The Canadian Style gives concise answers to questions concerning written English in the Canadian context. It covers such topics as the decimal point, abbreviations, capital letters, punctuation marks, hyphenation, spelling, frequently misused or confused words and Canadian geographical names. It also includes useful advice for drafting letters, memos, reports, indexes and bibliographies. In addition, The Canadian Style includes techniques for writing clearly and concisely, editing documents, and avoiding stereotyping in communications.”

The style guide is searchable by chapter as well as by index. (Everything you need to know about the semicolon is here.)

I will be recommending several sections of the style guide to my students this fall, in particular those on the topics of revision and plain language.

—–

Addendum: The PWGSC homepage also links you to the delightful “Language Portal of Canada.” There you will find all manner of language and writing resources. You will also be tempted by its huge collection of quizzes, one or two of which I have already found more humbling than I would have hoped.

Posted in Robert's posts | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment